Does Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) have an economic moat?

MoatScan AI rates Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) 40/100 for moat strength, assessed across five sources of competitive advantage: network effects, switching costs, intangible assets, cost advantages and efficient scale. Pinterest has a differentiated but limited competitive position.

What is Pinterest, Inc.'s moat score?

Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) has a moat score of 40/100. The score is a weighted average of five pillar ratings: network effects, switching costs, intangible assets, cost advantages, and efficient scale. A higher score means the competitive advantages MoatScan AI identifies are wider and more durable.

How does PINS's share price compare with its estimated fair value?

MoatScan AI estimates PINS's intrinsic value with a discounted cash flow (DCF) model and shows how that estimate compares with the market price at the time of analysis. The estimate updates with each new financial analysis and is a research estimate, not a recommendation.

What is Pinterest, Inc.'s fair value estimate?

MoatScan AI derives Pinterest, Inc.'s (PINS) fair value per share from a discounted cash flow (DCF) model built on the company's reported financials, analyst growth forecasts, and a discount rate reflecting its cost of capital. The Financial Analysis tab shows the estimate alongside every assumption behind it.

Back to Database

PINS$21.26

Pinterest, Inc.

Last Updated

Sep 2, 2026about 1 month ago

Moat & Trend

Management

AI Impact

Competitive Radar

Moat Score

40/100

Executive Summary

Pinterest has a differentiated but limited competitive position. Its best asset is a purpose-built visual discovery experience that captures high-intent users searching for ideas in home, fashion, beauty, recipes, and planning, which gives the platform more commercial relevance than a generic social feed. The service also benefits from a large corpus of saved content and an identifiable brand. However, Pinterest is easy to multi-home, advertisers can shift budgets elsewhere, and the company lacks the hard lock-in, dominant scale, or legally protected assets that would support a wide moat. The business remains attractive as a niche discovery and commerce channel, but its structural advantage is narrower than that of leading ad or social platforms. Competitive pressure from larger ecosystems and dependence on continued product execution keep the moat trend under pressure.

Network Effects

Inspiration Reinforces Itself

Pillar Strength

4.5/10

Pinterest has some real network reinforcement because every saved pin, board, and repin expands the usefulness of the corpus for future users. More content improves search relevance, recommendation quality, and the odds that a user finds a useful idea quickly. The platform’s 463 million monthly active users and long-running library of images create a meaningful discovery layer. Still, the effect is weaker than on a true social network because users do not need to coordinate with friends, creators can distribute similar content elsewhere, and many pins originate off-platform. That makes the network useful, but not strongly self-protecting.

Switching Costs

Light Behavioral Inertia

Pillar Strength

4/10

Switching costs are modest. Users may lose some convenience when they leave behind curated boards, saved ideas, and personalized recommendations, but those assets are not hard to recreate on competing apps or through browser bookmarks. Advertisers also face little lock-in because campaign setup, creative assets, and targeting can be transferred across major digital channels with limited friction. Pinterest Analytics and shopping catalog integrations create some workflow inertia for merchants, yet they do not amount to deep enterprise dependence. The platform is more sticky than a casual content app, but not enough to force long-term retention through structural switching frictions.

Intangible Assets

Brand And Data Corpus

Pillar Strength

5.5/10

Pinterest has a recognizable brand around inspiration, planning, and visual search, which matters because users often arrive with intent rather than pure entertainment consumption. It also has a proprietary corpus of billions of saved images and engagement signals that supports recommendation quality and shopping relevance. Those assets are valuable and difficult to rebuild quickly. However, the company does not rely on patents, exclusive licenses, or legally protected content rights that would prevent replication. Brand strength is real but not category-dominant, and the data advantage depends on continued user engagement. That makes the intangible layer meaningful, but not durable enough for a wide moat.

Cost Advantages

Scale Helps, Not Enough

Pillar Strength

3.5/10

Pinterest has some scale benefits in hosting a large content library, training recommendation models, and spreading trust-and-safety and product development costs over a sizable user base. Those advantages do lower unit costs compared with a smaller niche entrant. But the company does not enjoy a structurally lower-cost position versus major competitors that can outspend it on AI, sales, or advertising infrastructure. Content moderation and user acquisition remain meaningful expenses, and the platform still needs to fight for attention across crowded digital channels. The gap is therefore real but modest, and rivals can narrow it with capital and execution.

Efficient Scale

Niche, Not Monopoly

Pillar Strength

2.5/10

Pinterest does not operate in a market with efficient scale in the classic sense. Visual discovery and digital advertising are crowded, and the company competes with Meta, Google, TikTok, Amazon, and numerous commerce platforms for both users and ad dollars. The business is specialized, but specialization is not the same as structural scarcity. New entrants still face the challenge of building audience density, yet the market is large enough that several platforms can coexist and win subsets of attention. Pinterest is therefore a meaningful niche player, not a natural monopoly or entrenched oligopoly with protected economics.

Moat Type & Trend

Why this company earns its moat rating, and where the moat is heading

Moat Type

Narrow Moat

Trend

Negative

Why This Rating

Pinterest earns a Narrow Moat because it owns a distinct user use case: inspiration discovery, planning, and increasingly shopping intent. That position can persist, but it is not broad enough to qualify as wide because the service is easy to multi-home, the audience is concentrated in a few use cases, and advertisers have many alternative channels. In 20 years, Pinterest can still be relevant as a visual discovery destination, but it is unlikely to command the same all-purpose network density, pricing power, or ecosystem lock-in that defines a wide moat.

Why This Trend

The moat is weakening modestly because Pinterest’s core discovery funnel faces pressure from larger platforms and changes in upstream traffic sources. The company still adds useful commerce and ad tools, but it has not built barriers that prevent users or advertisers from shifting attention elsewhere. To turn the trend positive, Pinterest would need to deepen exclusive shopping workflows, raise creator dependence on the platform, and prove that its visual search and intent graph are becoming harder to replicate by Meta, Google, TikTok, or Amazon.

Management Quality Assessment

Evaluating leadership track record, capital allocation, and governance

Verdict

Competent

Bill Ready has led Pinterest since June 2022, bringing senior operating experience from PayPal and Google, and his tenure has coincided with stronger user engagement, especially among Gen Z, and Pinterest’s best advertiser performance to date. Capital allocation looks mixed: the company has favored small, capability-building acquisitions rather than large deals, but ROIC has recently turned negative even as margins improved, suggesting execution is still not translating into durable capital efficiency. Pinterest is not founder-run operationally, though co-founder Ben Silbermann remains executive chairman and owns a meaningful stake; Ready’s ownership is modest at about 0.12%, with a recent share sale adding little confidence. CEO pay of $18.1 million appears rich versus performance, but the board is largely independent and no major governance red flags stand out.

Key Highlights

Bill Ready has been CEO since June 2022 and brought deep operating experience from PayPal and Google; under his watch, Pinterest reported record user growth and stronger Gen Z engagement.
Capital allocation has been disciplined on M&A: Pinterest has relied mostly on small tuck-in deals such as Instapaper, The Yes, Vochi, and tvScientific rather than transformative acquisitions.
ROIC has weakened sharply, with recent readings in negative territory despite improving operating margins, indicating management still has work to do on capital efficiency.
CEO compensation was $18.1 million in the latest proxy year, which looks elevated relative to performance and peer norms, while Ready’s ownership remains low at roughly 0.12%.
Governance appears reasonably clean: the board is predominantly independent, Ben Silbermann remains a sizable shareholder as executive chairman, and no major restatement or fraud issues are evident.

AI Impact Assessment

Evaluating how AI strengthens or disrupts existing moat pillars

Net Pressure. AI clearly improves Pinterest’s core recommendation and monetization engine because the platform owns rich first-party intent data — saves, boards, searches, and shopping interactions — that rivals cannot replicate quickly. But the moat is being reinforced more than expanded: AI search, conversational discovery, and Performance+ mainly make the existing product better and more efficient rather than creating a new structural advantage. The biggest benefit is better relevance and advertiser ROI; the biggest risk is that AI-native search and shopping assistants compress the value of visual discovery and lower the cost of similar ad optimization elsewhere. Near-term uncertainty is whether Pinterest can turn engagement gains into durable monetization while U.S./Canada user growth is flat.

AI Opportunity Highlights

6 / 10

Pinterest’s first-party taste graph from saves, boards, searches, and shopping interactions improves personalization in ways outside models cannot replicate without similar proprietary behavior data.
The AI-powered conversational Pinterest Assistant can surface inspiration before users search, increasing session depth and strengthening Pinterest’s role as a shopping discovery starting point.
Performance+ and generative ad tools can improve advertiser ROI by producing and optimizing creative against Pinterest’s own intent signals and shopping context.
Pinterest MCP embeds the platform into advertisers’ copilots and agentic workflows, which can raise switching costs for media-buying teams.

AI Threat Highlights

5 / 10

Open-source and fit-for-purpose models can match leading proprietary models at lower cost, limiting any advantage from Pinterest’s internal AI stack.
AI-native search and shopping assistants can substitute for Pinterest’s discovery role, shifting users from the feed to conversational answer engines.
Generative ad-creative and optimization features are becoming table stakes across ad-tech, so Pinterest’s Performance+ tools are not hard to copy.
Flat or negative U.S. and Canada user growth means AI gains may lift monetization without fixing the underlying growth base, leaving the platform exposed if engagement stalls.

Sign in to see the full analysis

The Strategic Factor Breakdown, Management Quality Assessment, and AI Impact Assessment are available to registered users — it's free.

Last Updated

Sep 2, 2026about 1 month ago

Target Price

Analyst Consensus

FAIR VALUE

Financial Strength

Financial Score

69/100

Executive Summary

Pinterest’s strongest feature is its robust cash generation, with operating cash flow rising to $1.28B in FY 2025 and free cash flow reaching $1.25B, while revenue continued to scale from $2.58B in FY2021 to $4.22B in FY2025 and $4.56B TTM. Profitability has improved meaningfully as operating margin recovered to 7.58%, and gross margin remains near 80%, but net income remains noisy because FY2024 benefited from a large tax item. The balance sheet is still liquid, with a current ratio of 3.81, yet cash and net cash have compressed and debt has stepped up to 0.41 debt-to-equity, creating some tension versus the stronger earnings and cash-flow profile. Forecasts still point to continued growth, though at a moderating pace. Overall, Pinterest presents a stable, improving financial profile with solid cash flow and growth, offset by leverage creep and some earnings volatility, consistent with its mid-6.5 to 7.5/10 ratings.

Income Statement

Revenue · Margins · Profitability

Section Score

6.5/10

Pinterest shows solid top-line momentum, with revenue rising from $2.58B in FY2021 to $4.22B in FY2025 and TTM revenue reaching $4.56B, indicating continued growth and a modest reacceleration. Profitability has improved materially from the FY2022–FY2023 operating losses to a 7.58% operating margin in FY2025, while gross margin remains strong near 80%. However, net income is noisy: FY2024 included an outsized tax benefit that lifted earnings to $1.86B, so FY2025’s $417M and TTM’s $249M are more representative of underlying power. Against digital ad peers, margins are decent but not elite. Key risks are rising R&D and SG&A, plus earnings volatility from non-operating and tax items.

Financials are in millions USD unless otherwise specified

Metric	FY 2021	FY 2022	FY 2023	FY 2024	FY 2025	TTM
Period Ending	Dec 31, 2021	Dec 31, 2022	Dec 31, 2023	Dec 31, 2024	Dec 31, 2025	Jun 30, 2026
Revenue	2,578	2,803	3,055	3,646	4,222	4,556
Revenue Growth	52.31%	8.71%	9.01%	19.35%	15.79%	16.64%
Net Income	316.44	-96.05	-35.61	1,862	416.86	248.92
Net Income Growth	—	—	—	—	-77.61%	-87.07%
Profit Margin	12.27%	-3.43%	-1.17%	51.07%	9.87%	5.46%

Data as of Jun 30, 2026

Balance Sheet

Assets · Liabilities · Equity

Section Score

6.5/10

Pinterest’s balance sheet remains liquid, with current assets of $2.32B comfortably exceeding current liabilities of $609.81M and working capital at $1.71B. Cash and short-term investments of $1.28B still provide a buffer, though they are down sharply from prior periods and net cash has compressed to just $78.27M versus $2.21B a year ago. Total assets rose to $4.76B, but liabilities also increased to $1.87B, largely reflecting a sizable long-term deferred tax asset line and higher debt of $1.20B. Shareholders’ equity remains solid at $2.89B, yet it has fallen materially from $4.75B in FY2024, signaling a less robust equity cushion and weaker overall balance sheet quality.

Financials are in millions USD unless otherwise specified

Metric	FY 2021	FY 2022	FY 2023	FY 2024	FY 2025	Current
Period Ending	Dec 31, 2021	Dec 31, 2022	Dec 31, 2023	Dec 31, 2024	Dec 31, 2025	Jun 30, 2026
Total Current Assets	3,182	3,455	3,339	3,485	3,556	2,323
Total Assets	3,537	3,863	3,594	5,343	5,492	4,759
Total Current Liabilities	259.81	380.53	317.09	398.13	465.47	609.81
Total Liabilities	498.5	581.08	503.73	591.51	746.89	1,865

Data as of Jun 30, 2026

Cash Flow Statement

Operations · Investing · Financing

Section Score

7.5/10

Pinterest shows solid cash generation, with operating cash flow rising from $965M in FY 2024 to $1.28B in FY 2025, and TTM at $1.33B. Free cash flow remains strong at $1.25B in FY 2025 and $1.28B TTM, supported by modest capital spending of $32M and a 29.7% FCF margin. Cash conversion is generally good, though stock-based compensation is high at $880M in FY 2025 and $1.02B TTM, which dilutes quality. Working capital swings are present but manageable, while the large negative financing cash flow reflects aggressive share repurchases of $1.33B in FY 2025 and $3.10B TTM. Overall, cash generation is healthy and improving, with capital returns being the main use of cash.

Financials are in millions USD unless otherwise specified

Metric	FY 2021	FY 2022	FY 2023	FY 2024	FY 2025	TTM
Period Ending	Dec 31, 2021	Dec 31, 2022	Dec 31, 2023	Dec 31, 2024	Dec 31, 2025	Jun 30, 2026
Operating Cash Flow	752.91	469.2	612.96	964.59	1,284	1,334
Operating Cash Flow Growth	2,511.90%	-37.68%	30.64%	57.37%	33.14%	24.25%
Free Cash Flow	743.88	440.22	604.9	939.99	1,252	1,280
Free Cash Flow Growth	6,410.95%	-40.82%	37.41%	55.40%	33.18%	22.24%
Free Cash Flow Margin	28.85%	15.71%	19.80%	25.78%	29.65%	28.11%

Data as of Jun 30, 2026

Key Ratios

Liquidity · Leverage · Efficiency · Returns

Section Score

6.5/10

Pinterest shows a mixed but generally stable operating profile. Liquidity remains strong, with the current ratio still at 3.81 and the quick ratio at 3.62, though both have trended down materially from prior years, suggesting less cushion than before. Leverage was modest for most of the period, but the latest readings show a step-up in debt-to-equity to 0.41 and debt-to-EBITDA to 3.32, which is higher than its own history. Efficiency is steady, with asset turnover improving to 0.90. Profitability is uneven: ROE and ROIC were volatile, but ROA stayed positive and recent ROCE improved to 6.9%. Cash generation also strengthened, with FCF yield rising to 10.64%.

Ratios are dimensionless unless otherwise noted

Metric	FY 2021	FY 2022	FY 2023	FY 2024	FY 2025	Current
Period Ending	Dec 31, 2021	Dec 31, 2022	Dec 31, 2023	Dec 31, 2024	Dec 31, 2025	Sep 2, 2026
Debt / Equity Ratio	0.08	0.07	0.06	0.04	0.06	0.41
Quick Ratio	12.06	8.88	10.33	8.56	7.44	3.62
Current Ratio	12.25	9.08	10.53	8.75	7.64	3.81
ROEReturn on Equity (ROE)	11.98%	-3.04%	-1.12%	47.49%	8.78%	6.46%
ROAReturn on Assets (ROA)	6.63%	-1.72%	-2.11%	3.00%	3.69%	3.51%
ROICReturn on Invested Capital (ROIC)	43.62%	-12.54%	-15.83%	13.40%	12.05%	8.44%
ROCEReturn on Capital Employed (ROCE)	10.00%	-2.90%	-3.80%	4.30%	6.40%	6.90%

Data as of Sep 2, 2026

Growth

Revenue · EPS · Valuation · Estimates

Section Score

7.5/10

Pinterest’s top line shows a clear step-up in momentum: revenue grew from $2.58B to $3.65B through 2024, then is expected to keep compounding to $4.22B and $4.91B, with growth settling from the high-teens toward low-teens as the base expands. EPS has been much more volatile, with a sharp swing in 2024, a pullback in 2025, and then renewed growth in the forecast years, where earnings expansion remains positive but less explosive than revenue, suggesting steadier margin support rather than a major re-rating in profitability. Analyst sentiment is constructive, with a Buy consensus, a $22 to $42.36 target range, and 39 analysts. Recommendation trends are broadly stable, with holds clustered near 19-20 and no sells in recent months.

Third-party Analyst Price Targets

Low$22+3.48%

Median$28.5+34.05%

Average$28.99+36.36%

High$42.36+99.25%

BuyConsensus rating and price targets published by third-party analysts. Not a MoatScan AI view.

39 analysts

Third-party Analyst Recommendation Trends

Rating	Mar '26	Apr '26	May '26	Jun '26	Jul '26	Aug '26
Strong Buy	18	17	17	16	17	17
Buy	1	1	2	2	2	2
Hold	20	20	19	19	20	20
Sell	1	1	0	0	0	0
Strong Sell	0	0	0	0	0	0
Total	40	39	38	37	39	39

Forecast · Analyst Estimates

Revenue This Year4.91B

+16.32%from 4.22B

FY 2026

Revenue Next Year5.55B

+13.03%from 4.91B

FY 2027

EPS This Year· non-GAAP adj.2.03

+26.96%from 1.60

FY 2026

EPS Next Year· non-GAAP adj.2.40

+18.23%from 2.03

FY 2027

Historical · Reported Actuals

Metric	FY 2021	FY 2022	FY 2023	FY 2024	FY 2025
Revenue	2.58B	2.80B	3.06B	3.65B	4.22B
Revenue Growth	—	+8.73%	+8.99%	+19.35%	+15.80%
EPS (GAAP diluted)	0.46	-0.14	-0.05	2.67	0.61
EPS Growth	—	-130.43%	+64.29%	+5440.00%	-77.15%

Revenue in USD · EPS per share · Price targets in USD

Data as of Dec 31, 2025 · Forecast EPS is analyst non-GAAP adjusted; historical EPS is GAAP diluted — not directly comparable.

Fair Value Estimation

DCF · Model estimate vs. price -16.8% · Price above model estimate

AI Fair Value Estimate (DCF)

$17.69vs$21.26

Model estimate vs. price-16.8%

Price above model estimate

A discounted cash flow framework fits Pinterest because the business is already cash-generative and its operating profile can be projected with reasonable confidence as revenue scales. The modeled path shows improving cash conversion and disciplined capex, with free cash flow expanding from $99 million to $542 million as margins broaden and growth gradually normalizes, which is exactly the kind of ramp DCF is designed to capture.

AI Valuation Commentary

DCF is the right lens for Pinterest because the equity case depends on how efficiently revenue growth translates into durable cash flow. The valuation assumes a 7.4% discount rate, 4% terminal growth, 9.76% revenue CAGR, and an average 11.82% EBITDA margin, with capex remaining light at 0.62% of revenue. Even with that operating ramp, the shares screen as overvalued at a fair value of $17.69 versus a current price of $21.26, implying a -16.79% margin of safety. The result is most sensitive to margin durability and the discount rate. A stronger bull case would require better long-term monetization; a bear case would be driven by slower growth, weaker margins, or a higher cost of capital.

DCF Assumptions

WACC

7.4%

Weighted avg cost of capital

Revenue Growth (7Y)

9.8%

CAGR assumption

EBITDA Margin

11.8%

Steady-state projection

CapEx / Revenue

0.6%

Capital investment

Terminal Growth

4.0%

Long-run growth rate

Projection Period

7 yrs

Explicit forecast horizon

Projected Cash Flows

Values in millions USD

Year	Revenue	EBITDA	FCF	Discounted FCF
Yr 1	4,736	448	99	92
Yr 2	5,135	533	248	215
Yr 3	5,760	652	277	224
Yr 4	6,353	773	338	254
Yr 5	6,957	902	441	309
Yr 6	7,563	993	501	326
Yr 7	8,279	1,100	542	329
Terminal Value (PV)				10,058

Key Valuation Ratios

Current vs 5-year average

PE Ratio

162.59x

3Y avg 42.47x

+282.8% vs avg

Forward PE

9.97x

5Y avg 25.86x

-61.5% vs avg

P/FCF Ratio

9.40x

5Y avg 29.08x

-67.7% vs avg

PS Ratio

2.64x

5Y avg 6.56x

-59.7% vs avg

A multiple below its own multi-year average can indicate the stock is cheaper than its recent history — context, not a standalone signal.

Sign in to see the full analysis

The Income Statement, Balance Sheet, Cash Flow, Key Ratios, Forecast, and Fair Value analysis are available to registered users — it's free.

Last Updated

Aug 13, 2026

Short Term

Medium Term

Long Term

Technical Overview

$22.91Price at Analysis

PINS presents a mixed technical profile with a short-term tone that is softer than the intermediate backdrop. The stock is still above its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, and the broader trend remains labeled an uptrend, but Death Cross territory and a bearish MACD signal keep momentum from confirming a clean bullish continuation. Near term, price is hovering around the daily pivot, so the $22.81–$22.61 support pocket and the $23.05–$23.25 resistance band are the most important levels to monitor. Longer term, the monthly structure points to a larger range bounded by $21.88 on the downside and $24.6 to $25.4 on the upside, with the 52-week high still well out of reach.

Short Term

1 to 4 weeks

Sideways

PINS is trading only modestly below its 20-day moving average, while RSI at 54.3 still sits in a neutral-to-bullish zone and the broader price structure remains near the daily pivot. However, MACD is bearish and volume is extremely light at 0.04x average, which limits conviction and suggests the recent move lacks confirmation.

Key Indicators

Price vs 20-day MA-2.84% below

Price vs 50-day MA+3.04% above

RSI (14-day)54.3

RSI InterpretationNeutral

MACD TrendNegative (below signal)

Bollinger PositionLower half

Volume TrendContracting

Support

$22.81$22.61$22.44

Resistance

$23.05$23.25$23.40

The closest short-term reference is the daily pivot at $22.93, with immediate support at $22.81 and resistance at $23.05. In a 1–4 week window, a probe of the nearby $22.81 to $22.61 support zone looks more likely than an impulsive breakout, though $23.05 remains the first hurdle.

Medium Term

1 to 6 months

Sideways

The stock is slightly above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, which keeps the intermediate trend constructive, but the presence of Death Cross territory and a bearish MACD offsets that support. With the price sitting in the middle third of its 52-week range, the medium-term setup remains mixed rather than decisively bullish.

Key Indicators

Price vs 50-day MA+3.04% above

Price vs 200-day MA+1.42% above

52-Week Range PositionMiddle third (37%)

Trend DirectionUptrend

MA Cross SignalDeath Cross territory

Relative Volume0.04x avg

Support

$22.56$21.43$19.85

Resistance

$23.11$25.18$25.82

Weekly pivots place support at $22.56, which sits close to the 50-day/200-day moving average area and creates an important confluence zone, while resistance begins at $23.11 and extends to $25.18. Over 1–6 months, the stock is likely to test either the $22.56 support shelf or the $23.11 resistance band as the market resolves the current consolidation.

Long Term

6 months and beyond

Sideways

Longer term, PINS retains a modestly positive relationship to the 200-day moving average and the trend direction is still labeled uptrend, but that is tempered by Death Cross territory and the fact that the stock remains far below its 52-week high. The 52-week range position in the middle third and elevated volatility imply a structurally recoverable but not yet dominant trend.

Key Indicators

Price vs 200-day MA+1.42% above

52-Week High$38.57

52-Week Low$13.84

Distance from 52w High-40.6%

BB Bandwidth14.3%

MA CrossoverNone detected

Support

$21.88$21.05$19.69

Resistance

$24.60$25.40$26.79

Monthly pivots define broader boundaries at $21.88, $21.05, and $19.69 on the downside, with resistance at $24.6, $25.4, and $26.79. Over 6+ months, the key structural question is whether PINS can reclaim the $24.6 to $25.4 zone or, failing that, drift back toward the $21.88 monthly support and potentially the prior 52-week low region.

Sign in to see the full analysis

See the full short, medium & long-term indicator breakdowns and support/resistance levels — free for registered users.

Frequently asked questions about Pinterest, Inc.

Does Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) have an economic moat?: MoatScan AI rates Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) 40/100 for moat strength, assessed across five sources of competitive advantage: network effects, switching costs, intangible assets, cost advantages and efficient scale. Pinterest has a differentiated but limited competitive position.Sign in free to see the Moat Type verdict and the pillar-by-pillar reasoning.
What is Pinterest, Inc.'s moat score?: Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) has a moat score of 40/100. The score is a weighted average of five pillar ratings: network effects, switching costs, intangible assets, cost advantages, and efficient scale. A higher score means the competitive advantages MoatScan AI identifies are wider and more durable.Sign in free to see each pillar rating, the Moat Type verdict and the moat trend.
How does PINS's share price compare with its estimated fair value?: MoatScan AI estimates PINS's intrinsic value with a discounted cash flow (DCF) model and shows how that estimate compares with the market price at the time of analysis. The estimate updates with each new financial analysis and is a research estimate, not a recommendation.Sign in free to see the fair value estimate and how it compares with the price.
What is Pinterest, Inc.'s fair value estimate?: MoatScan AI derives Pinterest, Inc.'s (PINS) fair value per share from a discounted cash flow (DCF) model built on the company's reported financials, analyst growth forecasts, and a discount rate reflecting its cost of capital. The Financial Analysis tab shows the estimate alongside every assumption behind it.Sign in free to see the estimate and the full assumptions behind it.

Disclaimer: The analysis on this page is generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial adviser before making any investment decisions. MoatScan AI is an educational research tool. It is not licensed or registered with the Securities Commission Malaysia or any other financial regulator, and it holds no positions in, and receives no compensation from, any company analysed.

PINS$21.26

Sign in to see the full analysis

Sign in to see the full analysis

Sign in to see the full analysis

Frequently asked questions about Pinterest, Inc.

Other Narrow Moat companies