Does Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) have an economic moat?

Yes, though a limited one. Installed Building Products, Inc. earns a Narrow Moat rating with a moat score of 58/100, indicating competitive advantages expected to persist for roughly 10–20 years. Installed Building Products has a defensible but not dominant moat built on national scale in a highly fragmented, labor-intensive installation market.

What is Installed Building Products, Inc.'s moat score?

Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) has a moat score of 58/100 with a Narrow Moat rating and a stable moat trend. The score is a weighted average of five pillar ratings: network effects, switching costs, intangible assets, cost advantages, and efficient scale. Its strongest pillar is switching costs (6.5/10).

Is IBP stock overvalued or undervalued?

As of MoatScan's latest valuation, IBP appears undervalued. The AI-estimated fair value is $282.51 versus a market price of $240.23 at the time of analysis, implying roughly 18% upside to fair value. The estimate is based on a discounted cash flow (DCF) model and updates with each new financial analysis.

What is Installed Building Products, Inc.'s fair value estimate?

MoatScan estimates Installed Building Products, Inc.'s (IBP) fair value at $282.51 per share, derived from a discounted cash flow (DCF) model built on the company's reported financials, analyst growth forecasts, and a discount rate reflecting its cost of capital. See the Financial Analysis tab for the full assumptions behind the estimate.

Back to Database

IBP$240.23

Installed Building Products, Inc.

Last Updated

Aug 14, 2026about 3 hours ago

Moat & Trend

Management

AI Impact

Competitive Radar

Moat Score

58/100

Executive Summary

Installed Building Products has a defensible but not dominant moat built on national scale in a highly fragmented, labor-intensive installation market. Its broad branch footprint, builder relationships, and procurement leverage create meaningful advantages in sourcing, logistics, and jobsite execution, especially for insulation and adjacent installed products. Switching costs are real because construction schedules, quality compliance, and warranty risk make buyers cautious about changing vendors. However, the business lacks a true platform effect, its brand is more operational than iconic, and much of its pricing power depends on execution rather than a legally protected asset. That combination supports a Narrow Moat rather than a Wide Moat. The moat appears stable: IBP continues to consolidate share and extend distribution, but the industry still allows capable regional competitors to compete effectively.

Network Effects

Indirect Ecosystem Reinforcement

Pillar Strength

5.5/10

IBP benefits from an indirect ecosystem effect, but it is not a true network business. A larger branch footprint, broader installer base, and deeper supplier relationships can improve service levels, material availability, and scheduling coordination for builders. As more manufacturers and contractors work with IBP, the company can make its offering more convenient and reliable. Still, participants can multi-home easily, and there is no meaningful consumer-to-consumer or developer platform dynamic that compounds automatically. The value created by added participants is real, but it is mostly operational scale rather than a self-reinforcing network that would be difficult for a rival to copy.

Switching Costs

Builder Lock-In Friction

Pillar Strength

6.5/10

Switching costs are meaningful because IBP sits inside project-critical work where mistakes are visible and expensive. Builders and contractors care about on-time labor, code compliance, warranty support, and coordination across multiple trades. Even if another vendor offers a slightly lower bid, a change can introduce schedule risk, rework risk, and headaches for purchasing managers. That said, the friction is not absolute. Large customers can and do rebid work, especially when housing volumes slow or when local installers offer faster turnaround. The lock-in is therefore more behavioral and operational than contractual, creating repeat business without making customers permanently captive.

Intangible Assets

Regional Brand And Know-How

Pillar Strength

5.5/10

IBP has some intangible asset support from its long operating history, recognized local brand presence, and proprietary know-how around installation methods and jobsite management. The company also references patents and secured intellectual property, which suggests at least some technical differentiation in parts of the business. However, these assets do not resemble a category-defining national brand or a broad patent wall that prevents imitation. Most of the advantage comes from reputation with builders, safety performance, and reliable execution across markets. Competitors can approximate that proposition with enough time, good local management, and capital, so the intangible layer helps reinforce the moat but does not anchor it alone.

Cost Advantages

Scale Buying Power

Pillar Strength

6.5/10

IBP has a legitimate cost edge from national procurement, branch density, shared services, and the ability to spread overhead across a large revenue base. Its distribution platform and centralized buying should allow better pricing, timing, and terms on insulation and accessories than smaller regional installers can obtain. Cross-selling multiple installed products into the same account also improves labor utilization and reduces per-job overhead. Still, the business is labor-heavy, so wages, jobsite inefficiency, and local operating execution remain important cost drivers. Rivals with enough volume or private-equity backing can narrow some of the gap, which keeps this advantage meaningful but not unassailable.

Efficient Scale

Local Scale Advantage

Pillar Strength

5/10

IBP operates in a market that has some scale economics, but it does not look like a classic natural monopoly. National and regional customers value coverage, reliability, and a broad service footprint, which means a few large players can operate more efficiently than many small independents. At the same time, the addressable market is large, geographically dispersed, and still fragmented, so entry is possible for well-run local specialists. IBP’s branch network creates local density benefits, yet those advantages are strongest in specific markets rather than in the industry as a whole. This supports a moderate efficient-scale benefit, not an entrenched oligopoly.

Moat Type & Trend

Why this company earns its moat rating, and where the moat is heading

Moat Type

Narrow Moat

Trend

Stable

Why This Rating

Installed Building Products has real competitive advantages, but they remain narrower than a truly wide moat because most of the edge comes from scale, local execution, and customer relationships rather than an asset that would be nearly impossible to displace. The company can still lose volume if a large builder prefers a cheaper regional contractor or if a rival matches its logistics and service quality. What should still be true in 20 years is that the largest installed-systems platform will retain better procurement, coverage, and builder access than small independents; what will not be true is exclusive control over the category.

Why This Trend

The moat looks stable because IBP continues to reinforce the same core advantages: branch density, purchasing scale, and the ability to bundle multiple installed products across residential and commercial jobs. Recent acquisitions and the expansion of distribution support those strengths, but they do not yet change the competitive structure of the industry. To shift to Positive, IBP would need sustained share gains and visibly better pricing or margins versus regional rivals. A Negative trend would require builders to bypass IBP more often or for smaller contractors to match its service and procurement economics.

Management Quality Assessment

Evaluating leadership track record, capital allocation, and governance

Verdict

Strong

Jeffrey W. Edwards has led IBP as CEO since 2004 and chairman since 1999, making management unusually stable and clearly founder-led. Under his watch, IBP has compounded through disciplined tuck-in acquisitions rather than large transformative bets, while maintaining a five-year average ROIC of about 21.7%, a strong result for an industrial business. Capital allocation also looks balanced: the company has bought back stock, raised its dividend, and kept acquisitions focused on geographic and product-line expansion. Insider ownership trends are not fully clear, but open-market buying by the CFO and other insiders supports alignment. CEO pay of about $7.1 million appears broadly reasonable, and the board structure shows no major governance red flags.

Key Highlights

Jeffrey W. Edwards has served as CEO since 2004 and chairman since 1999, giving IBP unusually long and consistent leadership. The company is founder-led, which appears to have helped preserve strategic continuity.
IBP’s five-year average ROIC is roughly 21.7%, indicating management has generally deployed capital profitably and avoided obvious value destruction.
Growth has been driven by repeated tuck-in acquisitions, with management saying it added more than $100 million of annual revenue in 2024 and about $55 million in 2025. That pattern suggests a repeatable integration playbook rather than empire-building.
Shareholder returns are supported by active buybacks and dividend growth, including a recent $76.5 million repurchase tranche and a quarterly dividend increase to $0.39 per share.
Governance looks solid: the board includes a lead independent director, non-management executive sessions, and no obvious related-party or independence issues surfaced in the available record.

AI Impact Assessment

Evaluating how AI strengthens or disrupts existing moat pillars

AI Opportunity

5/ 10

AI Threat

3/ 10

Net AI Impact

+2Moderate Tailwind

IBP’s moat still comes from branch density, local builder relationships, labor execution, and cross-selling across a fragmented residential installation market, not from technology. AI should reinforce rather than redefine those strengths: analytics can improve pricing, scheduling, procurement, and ERP discipline across a large branch footprint, and the company’s accumulated job-level data may improve operational decisions. But these are mostly productivity gains that competitors can also access through off-the-shelf tools. The core service remains physical, local, and customized, which limits direct AI substitution. Net verdict: Net Neutral. Key uncertainty is whether IBP turns process data into a repeatable operating edge before AI becomes table stakes across the industry.

AI Opportunity Highlights

IBP has said AI-enabled analytics are part of its current priorities for productivity, pricing, sales effectiveness, supply-chain optimization, and ERP enhancements.
Its dense branch network and high volume of local installation jobs create operational data that can improve routing, scheduling, and labor utilization.
Scale in centralized purchasing and distribution can translate AI-driven demand forecasts into tighter material procurement and inventory control.
Analytics can deepen cross-selling across insulation, garage doors, gutters, blinds, and other complementary products for the same builder relationships.

AI Threat Highlights

The core installation work is labor-intensive and site-specific, so AI cannot easily create a product substitute or erase the need for local execution.
Off-the-shelf AI tools can replicate scheduling, quoting, and forecasting improvements, reducing the relative advantage of IBP’s internal analytics.
AI-enabled pricing and project-management software can lower barriers for smaller regional installers in a fragmented market, pressuring margins.
Foundation-model tools may improve quality-control inspections and customer-service workflows for rivals, narrowing service-level gaps over time.

Sign in to see the full analysis

The Strategic Factor Breakdown, Management Quality Assessment, and AI Impact Assessment are available to registered users — it's free.

Last Updated

Aug 14, 2026about 3 hours ago

Target Price

Analyst Consensus

FAIR VALUE

Financial Strength

Financial Score

69/100

Executive Summary

Installed Building Products’ most notable strength is its resilient cash generation, supported by solid margins and strong near-term liquidity. Revenue has grown steadily over time, though momentum has cooled recently, while net income and gross margin have generally improved despite a flatter operating margin and some SG&A pressure. The balance sheet remains healthy in the near term, with ample current assets and working capital, but leverage is meaningful and debt has risen, leaving tangible equity slightly negative. Cash flow quality is good, with operating cash flow and free cash flow remaining robust, although working-capital swings make conversion less smooth. Growth and forecast trends suggest a mature but still expanding business, with EPS holding up better than revenue. Overall, IBP presents a stable, cash-generative profile with moderate leverage and slowing top-line momentum, consistent with its mid-to-upper-tier ratings.

Income Statement

Revenue · Margins · Profitability

Section Score

7/10

Installed Building Products shows steady but moderating growth: revenue rose from about $2.67bn in FY2022 to $2.97bn in FY2025, while TTM revenue is slightly below FY2025, indicating growth has cooled. Net income improved consistently through FY2025, but TTM profit slipped versus the prior year, suggesting some reversion. Gross margin has gradually expanded, yet operating margin has been roughly flat to slightly down as SG&A rose with sales, so top-line gains have translated into bottom-line gains only partly. Earnings appear durable, with no major one-off distortions; other income and tax rates moved modestly, and falling interest expense helped. Against building-products peers, these margins and returns look solid, though slowing growth and cost pressure are the main flags.

Financials are in millions USD unless otherwise specified

Metric	TTM	FY 2025	FY 2024	FY 2023	FY 2022
Period Ending	Jun 30, 2026	Dec 31, 2025	Dec 31, 2024	Dec 31, 2023	Dec 31, 2022
Revenue	2,964	2,970.8	2,941.3	2,778.6	2,669.8
Revenue Growth	-0.23%	1.00%	5.86%	4.08%	—
Net Income	250.7	265.4	256.6	243.7	223.4
Net Income Growth	-5.54%	3.43%	5.29%	9.09%	—

Data as of Jun 30, 2026

Balance Sheet

Assets · Liabilities · Equity

Section Score

7/10

Installed Building Products shows a generally healthy balance sheet with strong near-term liquidity. FY2025 current assets were $1.04B against $344.2M of current liabilities, and TTM current assets rose to $1.16B versus $387.4M of current liabilities, supported by $321.9M of cash and $698.4M of working capital. Solvency is adequate but leverage is meaningful: total liabilities were $1.36B in FY2025 and $1.61B TTM, while total debt increased to $991.7M and $1.20B TTM. Shareholders’ equity has expanded over time from $493.5M in FY2022 to $709.9M in FY2025, though TTM fell to $639.5M. Tangible book remains slightly negative, reflecting goodwill and intangibles pressure.

Financials are in millions USD unless otherwise specified

Metric	TTM	FY 2025	FY 2024	FY 2023	FY 2022
Period Ending	Jun 30, 2026	Dec 31, 2025	Dec 31, 2024	Dec 31, 2023	Dec 31, 2022
Total Current Assets	1,155.8	1,042.6	1,054.9	1,070	884.4
Total Assets	2,251.2	2,068	2,059.9	1,981.3	1,778.9
Total Current Liabilities	387.4	344.2	359	346.4	328.1
Total Liabilities	1,611.7	1,358.1	1,354.6	1,311	1,285.4

Data as of Jun 30, 2026

Cash Flow Statement

Operations · Investing · Financing

Section Score

7.5/10

Installed Building Products shows solid cash generation, with operating cash flow rising from $277.9 million in FY2022 to $371.4 million in FY2025, while TTM CFO of $360.0 million remains close to that level. Free cash flow is also healthy at $300.8 million in FY2025 and $291.7 million TTM, supported by manageable capital expenditures of $70.6 million and $68.3 million. The main weakness is persistent working-capital drag, which has kept cash conversion below net income at times and made CFO less smooth. Capital allocation is active: the company returned significant cash through buybacks and dividends while also using debt. Overall, cash flow quality is good, though not exceptionally stable.

Financials are in millions USD unless otherwise specified

Metric	TTM	FY 2025	FY 2024	FY 2023	FY 2022
Period Ending	Jun 30, 2026	Dec 31, 2025	Dec 31, 2024	Dec 31, 2023	Dec 31, 2022
Operating Cash Flow	360	371.4	340	340.2	277.9
Operating Cash Flow Growth	-3.07%	9.24%	-0.06%	22.42%	—
Free Cash Flow	291.7	300.8	251.4	278.6	232.3
Free Cash Flow Growth	-3.03%	19.65%	-9.76%	19.93%	—

Data as of Jun 30, 2026

Key Ratios

Liquidity · Leverage · Efficiency · Returns

Section Score

6.5/10

Installed Building Products shows very strong short-term liquidity, with current and quick ratios staying extremely high across the period and remaining stable in the latest TTM. Leverage is the main area to watch: debt-to-equity fell from 2022 to 2024 but moved back up in TTM, and long-term debt to equity followed a similar pattern, suggesting balance-sheet risk has not fully eased. Efficiency is respectable but not improving, as asset turnover has drifted lower in TTM versus prior years. Profitability remains solid and broadly steady, with gross margin edging up, operating margin holding near 13%, and net margin improving modestly. Returns on equity remain strong, though ROA softened in TTM.

Ratios are dimensionless unless otherwise noted

Metric	Current	FY 2025	FY 2024	FY 2023	FY 2022
Period Ending	—	Dec 31, 2025	Dec 31, 2024	Dec 31, 2023	Dec 31, 2022
Current Ratio	302.905	302.905	293.844	308.891	269.552
Quick Ratio	243.928	243.928	239.638	261.894	215.727
Profit Margin	8.93%	8.93%	8.72%	8.77%	8.37%
After Tax ROE	37.386	37.386	36.382	36.357	45.268
Return on Assets	11.14%	12.83%	12.46%	12.30%	12.56%
Debt to Equity	1.87	1.4	1.39	1.42	1.92
P/E Ratio	25.89	27.95	19.47	20.94	13.54
Forward P/E	21.09	23.53	15.38	19.12	11.78

Data as of Dec 31, 2025

Growth

Revenue · EPS · Valuation · Estimates

Section Score

6.5/10

Revenue has shown a generally upward trend, rising from 2.67B USD to 3.11B USD, but the path is uneven: growth accelerated in FY2024, then slowed sharply in FY2025 and FY2026 before recovering in FY2027. That suggests a maturing but still expanding business rather than a smooth step-up. EPS has compounded more steadily, moving from 7.74 to 11.39 per share, with forecast EPS growth re-accelerating from FY2026 to FY2027. The earnings outlook therefore looks slightly stronger than revenue momentum, implying some margin support. Analyst sentiment is cautious overall: a Hold consensus, 11 analysts, and a wide 200 to 297 USD target range. The recommendation mix has been stable, with a strong sell removed and no further deterioration.

Analyst Price Targets

Low$200-16.75%

Median$246+2.40%

Average$244.82+1.91%

High$297+23.63%

HoldConsensus rating based on analyst coverage

11 analysts

Recommendation Trends

Rating	Aug '26	Jul '26	Jun '26	May '26
Strong Buy	0	0	0	0
Buy	1	1	1	1
Hold	12	12	12	12
Sell	0	0	0	0
Strong Sell	0	0	0	1
Total	13	13	13	14

Forecast · Analyst Estimates

Revenue This Year3.00B

+0.88%from 2.97B

FY 2026

Revenue Next Year3.11B

+3.72%from 3.00B

FY 2027

EPS This Year· non-GAAP adj.10.44

-8.75%

FY 2026

EPS Next Year· non-GAAP adj.11.39

+9.12%

FY 2027

Historical · Reported Actuals

Metric	FY 2025	FY 2024	FY 2023	FY 2022
Revenue	2.97B	2.94B	2.78B	2.67B
Revenue Growth	+1.00%	+5.86%	+4.08%	—
EPS (GAAP diluted)	9.71	9.10	8.61	7.74
EPS Growth	+6.70%	+5.69%	+11.24%	—

Revenue in USD · EPS per share · Price targets in USD

Data as of Dec 31, 2025 · Forecast EPS is analyst non-GAAP adjusted; historical EPS is GAAP diluted — not directly comparable.

Fair Value Estimation

DCF · +17.6% Margin of Safety · Undervalued

AI Fair Value Estimate (DCF)

$282.51vs$240.23

Margin of Safety+17.6%

Undervalued — Margin of safety detected

A discounted cash flow framework fits Installed Building Products because the business is steadily cash generative, with relatively visible revenue conversion and disciplined capital intensity that allows operating performance to translate into free cash flow. The projected path points to expanding margins and continued capex restraint as revenue scales, while the gradual slowing in growth into the terminal period reflects a normal fade from a strong multi-year operating ramp rather than perpetual high growth.

AI Valuation Verdict

A discounted cash flow lens is appropriate for Installed Building Products because the company’s economics are driven by recurring operating cash generation, moderate capital needs, and a revenue base that can be projected with reasonable confidence. The valuation assumes a 7.6% discount rate, 2% terminal growth, 6.07% five-year revenue CAGR, 19.08% average EBITDA margin, and capex at 2.24% of revenue. That framework produces a fair value of $282.51 per share versus a current price of $240.23, implying a 17.6% margin of safety and an undervalued verdict. The result is most sensitive to margin durability, WACC, and terminal growth. Stronger execution and sustained cash conversion would support upside; weaker margins or a higher discount rate would narrow it.

DCF Assumptions

WACC

7.6%

Weighted avg cost of capital

Revenue Growth (5Y)

6.1%

CAGR assumption

EBITDA Margin

19.1%

Steady-state projection

CapEx / Revenue

2.2%

Capital investment

Terminal Growth

2.0%

Long-run growth rate

Projection Period

5 yrs

Explicit forecast horizon

Projected Cash Flows

Values in millions USD

Year	Revenue	EBITDA	FCF	Discounted FCF
Yr 1	3,031	504	355	330
Yr 2	3,159	568	345	298
Yr 3	3,369	646	391	314
Yr 4	3,641	736	452	337
Yr 5	3,837	822	516	358
Terminal Value (PV)				6,516

Sign in to see the full analysis

The Income Statement, Balance Sheet, Cash Flow, Key Ratios, Forecast, and Fair Value analysis are available to registered users — it's free.

Last Updated

Aug 14, 2026

Short Term

Medium Term

Long Term

Price Outlook

$240.23Price at Analysis

The path of least resistance is modestly higher in the near term, with a likely probe toward $245.8 and potentially $248.1 if momentum holds. The key downside risk is a loss of $239.54, which would expose $237.52 and then $234.24; over a broader horizon, $251.79 is the first meaningful resistance to clear before the trend can improve materially.

Technical Overview

IBP’s technical profile is mixed across horizons. The short-term tape has improved, with price holding above the 20-day average, MACD positive, and RSI neutral-to-firm, but the move is not yet backed by strong volume. The medium-term picture is more cautious: price is above the 50-day average, yet still below the 200-day, and the recent Death Cross keeps the intermediate trend from turning decisively bullish. Long term, the stock remains technically damaged, trading in the lower third of its 52-week range and still well under the annual high. The most relevant levels to watch are the daily support at $239.54 and resistance at $245.8 in the short run, then $229.28 and $251.79 on the weekly frame as the broader battlegrounds.

Short Term

1 to 4 weeks

Bullish

IBP’s near-term setup is constructive: price is above the 20-day moving average, MACD is bullish, and RSI sits in a neutral-to-supportive zone rather than an overbought extreme. The main caveat is that volume is contracting, so the current advance lacks strong participation and may need a retest of nearby support to sustain momentum.

Key Indicators

Price vs 20-day MA+2.72% above

Price vs 50-day MA+7.12% above

RSI (14-day)56.7

RSI InterpretationNeutral

MACD TrendBullish (above signal)

Bollinger PositionUpper half

Volume TrendContracting

Support

$239.54$237.52$234.24

Resistance

$245.80$248.10$251.37

The closest short-term reference is the daily pivot support at $239.54, just below the current price, with additional support at $237.52 and $234.24. Resistance is nearby at $245.8 and $248.1, making a retest of $245.8 the most likely upside check in the 1–4 week window.

Medium Term

1 to 6 months

Neutral

The intermediate trend is mixed. Price remains above the 50-day moving average, but it is still below the 200-day and in recent Death Cross territory, which tempers confidence in a sustained multi-month uptrend.

Key Indicators

Price vs 50-day MA+7.12% above

Price vs 200-day MA-8.42% below

52-Week Range PositionLower third (30%)

Trend DirectionSideways

MA Cross SignalDeath Cross territory

Relative Volume0.40x avg

Support

$229.28$227.56$222.33

Resistance

$251.79$257.02$258.74

Weekly pivots place support at $229.28, $227.56, and $222.33, which align with the broader pullback zone beneath the 50-day moving average. Resistance at $251.79, $257.02, and $258.74 sits above the current price and overlaps with the area around the 200-day gap, so those levels are plausible tests over 1–6 months if momentum continues.

Long Term

6 months and beyond

Bearish

The long-term structure remains negative because price is still below the 200-day moving average and the stock sits in the lower third of its 52-week range, well off the yearly high. The recent Death Cross also reinforces that the broader trend has not yet fully repaired, even though momentum has improved in the short run.

Key Indicators

Price vs 200-day MA-8.42% below

52-Week High$349.00

52-Week Low$193.11

Distance from 52w High-31.2%

BB Bandwidth15.0%

MA CrossoverRecent Death Cross (61 days ago)

Support

$238.93$236.16$212.97

Resistance

$243.32$254.91$269.28

Monthly pivots define a broader range with support at $238.93, $236.16, and $212.97, while resistance appears at $243.32, $254.91, and $269.28. Over 6+ months, the market is most likely to keep working within this band unless it can reclaim the upper monthly resistance zone and move back toward the 52-week high.

Sign in to see the full analysis

See the full short, medium & long-term indicator breakdowns and support/resistance levels — free for registered users.

Frequently asked questions about Installed Building Products, Inc.

Does Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) have an economic moat?: Yes, though a limited one. Installed Building Products, Inc. earns a Narrow Moat rating with a moat score of 58/100, indicating competitive advantages expected to persist for roughly 10–20 years. Installed Building Products has a defensible but not dominant moat built on national scale in a highly fragmented, labor-intensive installation market.
What is Installed Building Products, Inc.'s moat score?: Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) has a moat score of 58/100 with a Narrow Moat rating and a stable moat trend. The score is a weighted average of five pillar ratings: network effects, switching costs, intangible assets, cost advantages, and efficient scale. Its strongest pillar is switching costs (6.5/10).
Is IBP stock overvalued or undervalued?: As of MoatScan's latest valuation, IBP appears undervalued. The AI-estimated fair value is $282.51 versus a market price of $240.23 at the time of analysis, implying roughly 18% upside to fair value. The estimate is based on a discounted cash flow (DCF) model and updates with each new financial analysis.
What is Installed Building Products, Inc.'s fair value estimate?: MoatScan estimates Installed Building Products, Inc.'s (IBP) fair value at $282.51 per share, derived from a discounted cash flow (DCF) model built on the company's reported financials, analyst growth forecasts, and a discount rate reflecting its cost of capital. See the Financial Analysis tab for the full assumptions behind the estimate.

Disclaimer: The analysis on this page is generated by AI and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial adviser before making any investment decisions.

IBP$240.23

Sign in to see the full analysis

Sign in to see the full analysis

Sign in to see the full analysis

Frequently asked questions about Installed Building Products, Inc.

Other Narrow Moat companies